Kevin Falcone on Mon, 28 Aug 2000 23:41:07 -0400 (EDT) |
>>>>> "BJ" == Bill Jonas <bj@netaxs.com> writes: BJ> it was stated that GnuPG doesn't have this vulnerability. The BJ> reason given was that it follows the OpenPGP spec, which doesn't BJ> have a requirement for ADK capability. well, considering that the gnupg author just added the ability to have ADKs listed in the output of the --list-* functions to CVS, I would think that it isn't vulnerable. Ah, yes, here it is: <http://lists.gnupg.org/gnupg-users-200008/msg00266.html> <flamebait deleted> -kevin -- See, these two penguins walked into a bar, which was really stupid, 'cause the second one should have seen it. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|