Michael W. Ryan on Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:37:37 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > The "standard means" yes, but not the only means - which was > part of the discussion (as I understood it). And just as the > "default" means of configuration on Linux is also via a "GUI", but > you can fall back to text - so it is on Windows. Huh? No, the standard, primary means of configuring Linux is via text files. There are some applications that provide a GUI, but at the core, Linux is still configured via plaintext files. > I agree with you - UNFORTUNATELY, since MS told developers to > use the Registry INSTEAD of .ini files, many applications out there > can (and are) configurable via the Registry. Being able to configure an application via the Registry is a side effect. Microsoft, nor any competent developer, would recommend using the Registry to configure an application. Any time that MS gives a procedure that involves editing the Registry, you do so at your own risk. The Registry was meant to be a repository for persistent information. That is NOT the same as a means of configuration. It's like saying that you should configure an application by using a hex editor on the executable file. While you seem to be responding from a combination of misunderstanding and having a chip on your shoulder, continuing this discussion isn't really germaine to this list. Michael W. Ryan, MCP, MCT | OTAKON, Video Operations mryan@netaxs.com | Convention of Otaku Generation http://www.netaxs.com/~mryan/ | http://www.otakon.com/ No, I don't hear voices in my head; I'm the one that tells the voices in your head what to say. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|