Tracy Nelson on Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:17:50 -0500 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "one bad brain" <vex@unixpunk.dhs.org> > I am all for security, and I am intergrating crypto as much as possible, but unless you can afford shielded cases and (physical) bug-detecting equipment, I think this may be a little unnecessary to take this step at the moment... a 50% performance hit is a little unreasonable. 50%?! Holy cow, maybe they should compress the data before they encrypt it. Less data to move all around, and hopefully the bandwidth you save will make up for the encrypt/decrypt overhead. Of course, the real solution is to build the encryption into the HD controller, but I doubt we'll see that anytime soon. Any guesses as to the effectiveness of weak crypto? I mean, seriously, if the local PD confiscates your box and you've just XORed everything, how long do you think this would delay them? It would certainly defuse a straight-on brute force search with find/grep or similar tools. How sophisticated is local law enforcement? Of course, if you're nabbed by the FBI or their buddies, you're most likely hosed regardless of what you use... ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|