Michael Leone on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:13:34 -0500 |
On 05 Mar 2001 21:58:37 -0500, MaD dUCK wrote: > also sprach Michael Leone (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 09:53:09PM -0500): > > How can that 2.00 possibly mean 200%? The load can only be measured up to 100%; > > over 100% would indicate that the load is higher than the CPU can handle (100% being > > defined as "maximum amount of processing that the CPU is capable of"). > > mh. well, i am not entirely sure of this, but i thought that a load of > 2.00 indicates that to the best of linux's knowledge, two of the > processors of which one is currently running would be 100% busy. No; I've seen (on the postfix mailing list) where someone once mentioned that their Linux mail server once temporarily hit *6* on a load average (while cleared a heavily backed up mail queue). So I doubt that means 600%, or that this guy had 6 processors. > > otherwise you will have to persuade me that 2.00 is 2% and that my > systems on average use only 0.30% of the cpu. :) I think there's something more involved to deciphering that number. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael J. Leone Registered Linux user #201348 <mailto:turgon@mike-leone.com> ICQ: 50453890 PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF You've got your glory, you've paid for it all You take your pension in loneliness and alcohol Billy Squier, "Everybody wants you" ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|