Bill Jonas on Sun, 25 Mar 2001 00:40:16 -0500 |
Just a couple little nitpicks (you knew this was coming, right? ;) )... On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:13:56PM -0500, Michael Leone wrote: > apt-get update && apt-get upgrade I'd use dist-upgrade instead of just upgrade; check the man page for the precise differences between the two, but in a nutshell, a simple upgrade will not upgrade a package if that package's dependencies have changed and the change will affect the install status of another package on the system. It is simply an "in-place" upgrade of all the packages on the system. A dist-upgrade, on the other hand, does what upgrade does in addition to handling changing dependencies. To take an example, I reported, some time back, a bug on a package (I forget which one). It was using /usr/bin/mail, but it didn't depend on the mailx package. The maintainer also fixed some other bugs in the newer package. So if you had this package installed and mailx was not installed, an upgrade would leave this package at its current version and not install mailx. A dist-upgrade would upgrade the package *and* install mailx. > running bind on that machine (like most distros, Debian installs and > starts bind by default)- unecessarily, since my firewall runs a I question this assertion. I've done several installs of Debian and have never had bind installed until I requested an 'apt-get install bind'. Perhaps you picked task packages in tasksel that depend on bind for one reason or another? -- Bill Jonas * bill@billjonas.com * http://www.billjonas.com/ "As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously." -- Benjamin Franklin ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|