gabriel rosenkoetter on Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:50:06 -0400 |
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 10:33:54AM -0400, Tim Peeler wrote: > That's a good point, speed would be comprimised by doing numerous reads > on the file, and that speed loss would be more than the 40 some odd bytes > of the header. But you do have to agree that it would make revisions > to the ELF format easier to implement. But there is also the fact that > any new revisions shouldn't really increase the header that much anyway > (what having to deal with 50 bytes instead of 40???), so I can see the > point of using the structured approach. I don't know that the ELF header does, but this is the reason that many structures within operating systems leave a few spare bytes around or reuse bytes differently in later revisions. (True, actually, even at the hardware design level.) ~ g r @ eclipsed.net ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|