Jeff Abrahamson on Sun, 19 Aug 2001 12:40:09 +0200 |
I want to be able to sort my photos by date. But I might rotate them or do other transforms that changes the modification date set by my camera. So I typically encode the date and time of the photo in the name of the photo. (For an example of how to do this, see my script new-image at <http://www.purple.com/GPL/>.) The thing is, I want the file names to have the following properties: - start with natural language, so I never have to start by typing numbers. - encode the date in human readable form. (I've got those two.) - Allow for sorting by date, even through an eval or backtick expression. I can't count on `ls -t`, because I might have rotated the images or, at some distant point in the future, copied to a new file system and accidentally lost mtime info. I could just encode unix time, which is ok for the next thirty years or so. But it seems cumbersome. Already I've got long files names like jim_waterfall_buttes_chaumont__Sat-19-May-2001_14:08.jpg I guess I could do jim_waterfall_buttes_chaumont__990225432__Sat-19-May-2001_14:08.jpg (I made up that mtime number. Disturbingly, I did a good job.) It's just ugly and fails any concept of normal form. I'm wondering if someone has a better idea. Perhaps I should just parse the trailing date. There must be an easier way, since in the end, then, I need a program that takes a bunch of these file names and dumps on stdout a permutation of those names that is time sorted. As I ask the question, I hear the answer: parse it and get over it. -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson <http://www.purple.com/jeff/> ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|