Bill Patterson on Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:50:21 +0100 |
Art wrote: "It is also bizarre that the report is the bankruptcy is caused by the cable franchisees not paying @home enough, but at the same time, it is reported that @home is a "partnership" of (i.e. owned by) the cable company franchisees???" Check out http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/gtevatt/Default.htm which refers to an anti-trust case in which it is said that "GTE's Internet subsidiaries sue AT&T's cable subsidiary, TCI, as well as cable company Comcast, and ISP, At Home, alleging that bundling high speed cable data transport with ISP service is a violation of Sherman Antitrust Act." ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|