Chris Beggy on Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:40:32 +0100 |
Leonard Rosenthol <leonardr@lazerware.com> writes: >>Arguably, X.509 is nicer, > > There are advantages and disadvantages to both X.509 and PGP > - > both technically as well as "user experience". > Another difference is the trust mechanism. X.509 requires a Certificate Authority and knows how to deal with chained authorizations. PGP doesn't require a certificate authority, but rather supports signing by any other keyholder. PGP can use the concept of web-of-trust in lieu of trust in the certificate authority. Chris ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|