Jeff Abrahamson on Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:10:17 +0100 |
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 08:29:37AM -0500, christophe barbé wrote: > IMHO tarball and debian do not fit well together. Each time you use a > tarball instead of a debian package, you decrease the power of debian > and its managment of dependencies (i.e. you broke dependencies). I sometimes resort to tarballs, but handle it by configuring with --prefix=/usr/local (often the default), and then PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH get /usr/local after /usr/bin and other debian controlled places. Or I even configure to $HOME/local for things that are just one user (and the user can decide whether to put $HOME/local first or last). In other words, tarballs don't necessarily obligate you to install to /usr/bin, which is what can mess up dpkg's view of the world. -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson <http://www.purple.com/jeff/> Buy my boyfriend's new novel: The Big Book of Misunderstanding <http://www.misunderstanding.net/buystuff.html> ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|