Kuzman Ganchev on Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:04:13 -0500 |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 11:59:40AM -0500, Jon Galt wrote: > And of course, 256 ^ 6 is 281474976710656, which is certainly a power of > two (2 ^ 48). And it also seems to represent a fairly large address > space! I doubt that 24 or 48 bytes are necessary, at this point in human > history. ;-) 48 bytes is a bigger address space than (I think) would be necessary for many generations to come... according to this estimate: http://itss.raytheon.com/cafe/qadir/q1797.html There are about 6 x 10^77 atoms in the visible universe (meaning the part that came from the big bang). Other google searches brought results within 20 orders of magnitude of this. So, 256^48 > (10^2)^48 = 10^96 > 6 x 10^77 Reading through the inequality we get: 256^48 > 6 x 10^77 and I assume that we will not need to adress every atom any time soon. Kuzman Attachment:
pgpb7Pzp4pSma.pgp
|
|