Mike Leone on Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:31:59 -0500 |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:59:10AM -0500, Gabe wrote: >It'll only cause a conflict if you happen to be on the same ethernet >segment. MAC addressing is only used on a "local" ethernet network. >It doesn't pass routers. Oh, so I suppose you don't want to be on >neighboring segments either. That would be a good way to *really* >confuse a router--broadcast arp yourself as a MAC addr already on >the other side. An intelligent implementation will ignore you. A >foolish implementation will break hardcore. I'd lay money that Cisco >routers do it right and Intel routers do it wrong. ;^> I have this horrible premonition that someone is going to put your above theory to the test. <G> ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|