Fred K Ollinger on Tue, 12 Feb 2002 02:00:15 +0100 |
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Mike Leone wrote: > > I thought IBM released the specs to their first PC, and that's what > > started all the clones. > > Yes, that's true. It's one of the reasons, if not *the* reason "IBM > compatibles" did so much better in the home computer market than > competitors. IBM contracted with Microsoft to write the first OS for the I don't think so. I know that there were better machines for the same price. Wasn't the amiga better (gui + sound), cheaper, and it had dos emulation? I thought that the reason that the other models failed was due to inept business decisions and standardization. That is MS benefited from the size of IBM which was trusted at the time, "nobody gets fired for buying IBM (now it's MS)". So people bought, at home, what they had at work. MS didn't write the OS, they just resold other people's work. Not to mention that soon after that, there were other oses that ran on the same hardware: dr-dos, and os2, both of which ran dos apps. I have heard that the two listed were better than MS' product at the time, so in this case, the market was not efficient. > machine. I'm not sure how things proceeded from there to where we are > now. Fred ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|