Jon Galt on Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:40:11 +0100 |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:03:24PM -0500, Jon Galt wrote: > > Well you make a good argument that MS did not contribute to cheap hardware > > - of course I was leaning that way anyhow. But what is this about > > Microsoft "breaking the law"? > > Your disagreement with anti-trust laws doesn't make them go away. Granted. To be honest, I pay little attention to governmental attacks on private companies - as well as government giving private companies advantages over their competitors. I'm sure Micro$oft has been on the receiving end of both of these things. I was under the impression that MS legal troubles, convictions, or whatever had been overturned. Judicial orders rescinded, or whatever. Can someone point me to a quick rundown of the events? Thanks, Wayne ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|