Jon Galt on Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:20:13 +0100 |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, LeRoy Cressy wrote: > If your friend would put a second ethernet card in the Linux box then > the Linux box can act as the firewall using either iptables or ipchains > depending upon the kernel that is in the Linux box. The configuration > would be: > > DSL Router --> eth0 Linux eth1 --> HUB <-- Windows Clients > > If you connect the HUB to the DSL Router then you do not have a > firewall. But the Linux box can be connected directly to the DSL Router > with setting it up as a firewall. Personally I am in favor of a > separate firewall with 3 NIC's, but I realize that for cost some want > the firewall to handle httpd and whatever services that you want to > serve up to the outside world. Thanks, I know he doesn't have a firewall. But the point is I'm trying to convince him *that* he needs a firewall, not *how*. Currently he seems convinced that firewalls are unnecessary extra devices (or software) that are not needed if you have control of your machine. > Your friend running anw windows box on a DSL without a firewall is in > extreme danger. All you need is an open port to write to and you're in > to do whatever you want. Now this is useful. What can be done with simply an open port number? Also, is there software I can get for my Linux box that I can use to port scan my Windows box? What about a packet sniffer (?) to watch all traffic on and into/out of my network? Thanks, Wayne ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|