Time on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:31:55 -0500 |
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 12:36:48AM -0500, Jon Galt wrote: > Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:36:48 -0500 (EST) > From: Jon Galt <jongalt@pinn.net> > To: Plug List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > Subject: [PLUG] file system error on boot > > Greetings fellow PLUGgers, I have a friend with this problem: > > Being much less of an expert than I would like to be, I think it'll be > more productive to just ask if anybody here can help... > > So, what's a superblock, and what should I tell him to do? > > Thanks, > Wayne > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [TriLUG] filesystem error on upgrade to RH 7.2 > > I still cannot get RH 7.2 running on my machine (5-year-old > Intrex, pentium 120, 64 Megs ram, 2 IDE hard drives, Windows > 98 and Minix in other partitions). > > No matter how I vary the installation, whether as upgrade from > RH 7.0 (which works fine) or as fresh install on newly > partitioned space (which I've tried in about six different > configurations), I get a filesystem error on booting after the > installation. > > I have learned that this happens when checking the root > filesystem. When the rc.sysinit script is running this > command: > initlog -c "fsck -T -a $fsckoptions /" > that command returns 11 > [ which I deduce (from man fsck) adds up from: > 1 file system errors corrected > 2 system should be rebooted > 8 operational error. > ]. > > It complains > invalid operand: 0000 > then it drops me to a "Repair filesystem" prompt, in a > situation where the root filesystem is still mounted > read-only. I can restart the installation in rescue mode and > then modify configuration files, but I am clueless as to what > to do. > > Here is one perhaps-enlightening exchange: > (Repair Filesystem) 8 # fsck.ext3 / > e2fsck 1.23, 15-Aug-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 > fsck.ext3: Is a directory while trying to open / This point here looks like it might define the main problem, where you are trying to mount the root filesystem '/' which is now formatted as ext3 from an ext2 enabled kernel or something to that affect. What I'm not understanding is why its erroring by dropping you to a shell to allow you to run e2fsck when in my past experiences it has simply kernel paniced. > > The superblock could not be read or does not describe a > correct ext2 > filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains > an > ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), > then > the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck > with an alternate superblock: > e2fsck -b 8193 <device> What version of Redhat are you upgrading from? What fs type are your partitions currently formatted as (meaning the number type as shown within fdisk) If the above is a mixture of ext2 and minix, have you tried to convert the ext2 to ext3 and/or migrate minix to ext3? Regards, Time 13 \ 9 . 3 clockbot.net / 6 ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|