Time on Mon, 1 Apr 2002 09:21:04 -0500 |
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 05:17:21AM -0500, Martin DiViaio wrote: > Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 05:17:21 -0500 (EST) > From: Martin DiViaio <scatterbrained@usermail.com> > To: Plug List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > Subject: Re: [PLUG] file system error on boot > > > > On the 30th day of March in the year 2002 you wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:36:48 -0500 (EST) > > From: Jon Galt <jongalt@pinn.net> > > To: Plug List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > > Subject: [PLUG] file system error on boot > > > > Greetings fellow PLUGgers, I have a friend with this problem: > > > > Being much less of an expert than I would like to be, I think it'll be > > more productive to just ask if anybody here can help... > > > > So, what's a superblock, and what should I tell him to do? > > > > Thanks, > > Wayne > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Re: [TriLUG] filesystem error on upgrade to RH 7.2 > > > > I still cannot get RH 7.2 running on my machine (5-year-old > > Intrex, pentium 120, 64 Megs ram, 2 IDE hard drives, Windows > > 98 and Minix in other partitions). > > > > No matter how I vary the installation, whether as upgrade from > > RH 7.0 (which works fine) or as fresh install on newly > > partitioned space (which I've tried in about six different > > configurations), I get a filesystem error on booting after the > > installation. > > > > I have learned that this happens when checking the root > > filesystem. When the rc.sysinit script is running this > > command: > > initlog -c "fsck -T -a $fsckoptions /" > > that command returns 11 > > [ which I deduce (from man fsck) adds up from: > > 1 file system errors corrected > > 2 system should be rebooted > > 8 operational error. > > > > > > It complains > > invalid operand: 0000 > > then it drops me to a "Repair filesystem" prompt, in a > > situation where the root filesystem is still mounted > > read-only. I can restart the installation in rescue mode and > > then modify configuration files, but I am clueless as to what > > to do. > > > > Here is one perhaps-enlightening exchange: > > (Repair Filesystem) 8 # fsck.ext3 / > > e2fsck 1.23, 15-Aug-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 > > fsck.ext3: Is a directory while trying to open / > > > > The superblock could not be read or does not describe a > > correct ext2 > > filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains > > an > > ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), > > then > > the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck > > with an alternate superblock: > > e2fsck -b 8193 <device> > > > > > > An EXT3 filesystem IS EXT2 only with journaling turned on. In fact, you > could mount an EXT3 filesystem as EXT2 and you would not notice the > difference except that the journals would not be maintained. > > Your friend is running fsck.ext3 incorrectly. The fsck program wants a > device not the mount point of a device. Since you did not say what > drive/partition/interface the root partition (/) is on, I can't tell you > what device you are looking for. Blah, how embarassing, I need to brush up on my reading comprehension 8( Regards, Time 13 \ 9 . 3 clockbot.net / 6 ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|