Darxus on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 04:00:14 +0200


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] should I update the detailed keysigning participants pages ?


On 04/23, Bill Jonas wrote:
> I don't really think it's worth the trouble.  If someone wants the
> information, it's stored in the signature itself.

I've thought about it.  I've also talked to the authors of the graphing
software about possibilities in morphing the graph over time.  They have
been interested in the subject as well, but haven't implemented the ability
yet.


On 04/23, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> Based on what, date of signing? But those won't match up, since not
> everyone signs at the same instant.

Yeah, in almost all cases people do their signing between the keysigning
they verified keys on and the next keysigning.  I can think of one
exception where Len took just over a month (I think he was out of town or
something), and I'm not certain there was another keysigning before he
signed keys.  And there's also a few cases where people in the keyring
signed the keys of other people in the keyring before they got to one
of our keysignings.  It could probably be automated pretty well, with
something like error checking to make sure that new signatures match
appropriately.  But.. I guess I agree with BJ that if anybody ever wants
the info, they can get it, without me maintaining these pages.

-- 
"You shall know the truth, and it shall make you odd."
-- Flannery O'Connor
http://www.ChaosReigns.com

Attachment: pgp8DRIA95wq9.pgp
Description: PGP signature