Noah silva on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:10:53 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] PLUG Wireless/ Co-op?


yes I can read TAC, but I didn't see anything.



On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:09:04PM -0400, Noah silva wrote:
> > Most ISPs say that you can't transport your internet connection to any
> > other buildings.  I suppose the 802.11b may not really be to another
> > building.  I also have speakeasy, also because their terms of service
> > are... better than most other places.  I don't know how happy they'd be if
> > they found out I was sharing the connection with my 500 closest
> > friends.
> 
> Hrm. I was going to find a TAC document (which you could read, but I
> guess most of PLUG couldn't) that talked about wireless e'net, as
> I'm pretty sure I've read one, but support.speakeasy.net seems to be
> rather broken right now. Oh well.
> 
> Point is, I'm pretty sure it's been made clear that they're not too
> concerned about this. (They've got public 802.11B hubs around
> Seattle that are on their network, to the best of my knowledge.)
> 
> They, being sane, realize that they're selling the bandwidth, which
> is not a nebulous concept.
> 
> > They think one IP = one computer, and you should have to pay per
> > computer.
> 
> This is definitely not the case with Speakeasy. (Their "setup
> instructions" sort of presume that, but that's more because anybody
> who's doing NAT doesn't need help doing it. Or, to put it more
> appropriately, if you think it's your ISP's responsibility to help
> you NAT, you shouldn't be doing it.) I'd go dig up a link about
> that on the TAC, but it's no less broken now.
> 
> > It really reminds me of the cable companies trying to charge you
> > per TV, until they got smacked down... didn't they learn the
> > first time?
> 
> Of course they did. They learned they can do this stuff and make
> extra money till someone slaps them on the wrist. Back to
> corporation game tactics. Stop being such an idealist. :^>
> 
> > The other thing I don't get is why they are worried in the first
> > place.  I can EASILY take up all the bandwidth with one computer,
> > or I might have four connected, and barely use it at all.
> 
> It's not your usage they're worried about, it's making more money
> off you any way they can.
> 
> These folks are NOT just selling bandwidth. They're verging on the
> licensing discussion.
> 
> -- 
> gabriel rosenkoetter
> gr@eclipsed.net
> 


______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -      http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  -  http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug