| gabriel rosenkoetter on Wed, 8 May 2002 17:28:08 -0400 |
|
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 04:57:54PM -0400, Paul wrote: > I skimmed it. This utility is good for examining the content of a > file, but it is a lower level utility than what I am looking for. > > I found a WordPerfect file viewer that runs through a Web browser. I > think it's for Windows only. Not good. > > The three options that I'm looking at are not desirable. Get WP for > Linux, have the user convert to Word format, or convert to PDF. I think you may be missing the unstated point I've been trying to make. Why do you actually need to read this document as a WordPerfect document? (The only reason I can think of is that you're editing it and returning it, in which case it's perfectly reasonable of you to ask this person for a document in a format you can read.) If all you're doing is reading the content of the document, and barring that's being largely graphical figures, strings(1) can give you what you need. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpZdiYExlQ4w.pgp
|
|