Paul on Thu, 23 May 2002 13:44:15 -0400 |
> No. Better site cost = amt of time spent rewriting x hourly cost of > the HTML designers ... which, if they outsource their web page, could > be noticable, especially if they have to examine multiple sub-pages. Then they should have done it right to begin with. Get rid of those Micro$oft Web developers. Or at least make the error page a warning page that other browsers might not work, then let us try. They might even get free advice on correcting the resulting errors. You used the phrase "HTML designers". That might be inaccurate. If they coded based on HTML standards, the site would be accessible to all browsers. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|