Michael Leone on Thu, 23 May 2002 13:10:50 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23 May 2002 at 12:11, Fred K Ollinger wrote: > Probably right, but let's do the cost benefit analysis. I'm betting > that if they sold one auto, they could get a site that was more > compatible. It's not like it's too expensive to do this right, so we > can forget about that. It's not like millions of people have to be > affected, either. > > If the people who did the job were really qualified to begin w/ then > we wouldn't be having this problem. > > Here's my calculations: better site cost = $0 No. Better site cost = amt of time spent rewriting x hourly cost of the HTML designers ... which, if they outsource their web page, could be noticable, especially if they have to examine multiple sub-pages. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 -- QDPGP 2.68 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBPO0iupq0HvZapbzfEQLtxQCgt+PvDQ84Exk6CwveyiegBIqlYrEAoIf4 p3r4O2U/mzNTZISR1zOKpm5F =T0OQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|