christophe barbé on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:28:24 -0400 |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:58:47AM -0400, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:17:35AM -0400, christophe barbé wrote: > > /etc/rc.d/init.d/ is outdated. > > The FSH say /etc/init.d/ and IIRC on recent RH distrib /etc/rc.d/init.d/ > > is a symlink to /etc/init.d/. > > Other way around on the RedHat end. > > (RH's way of doing things is a ridiculously over-complicated version > of the already ridiculously over-complicated SysV rc structure.) > > > You can reasonably expect all distributions to use /etc/init.d/ > > You're dreaming. :^> But it'd be a step in the right direction. Why ? RedHat, debian, Mandrake and the new LimitedLinux (oops sorry UnitedLinux) support the FHS (at least at some extends). > > And /etc/rc.d/rc.local is a RH kludge. > > A RH kludge of BSD-style init into SysV init, and just another > manifestation of Linux's BSD/SysV schizophrenia. > > (/etc/rc.local is a quite normale, sane way of doing things in > classic BSD rc.) As you said, in classic BSD. Christophe > > -- > gabriel rosenkoetter > gr@eclipsed.net -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E Dogs come when they're called; cats take a message and get back to you later. --Mary Bly Attachment:
pgpqyXame6LU9.pgp
|
|