|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] xinetd v. inetd (was: starting a program at boot)
|
gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> writes:
> Everyone else in the world still uses inetd. xinetd is, imho, just a
> bad idea. The theory is that having a bunch of files, one for each
> service, makes things easier to manage. It's not totally
> off-the-wall thinking; it means that multiple sysadmins editing
> inetd settings at the same time won't run into each other. But how
> often does inetd *really* need to be edited?
I didn't like that my ipv6 implementation for linux required
xinetd.
Maybe that will change.
Chris
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|