Chris Beggy on Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:01:03 -0400 |
Jason <jason@nocks.com> writes: > It would be interesting to replay history with the Linux kernel release under > a totally different license and see how things played out. But, until someone > releases TimeMachine 1.0, I guess we'll never know how things would be > different. But you will choose a GPL License when you release TimeMachine > 1.0, won't you? -Just a little attempt at humor... Something like this actually happened, though! 386BSD, a unix for ix86 PCs with a BSD, not-GPL license, first appeared in July 1992. This was about a year after the first Linux release. This release contained encumbered binaries, which were a source of legal problems for the distributors and the code was stillborn. The NetBSD carefully reworked the encumbered portions of the code and that kernel and OS continues today. Later, in 1993, the FreeBSD people carefully wrote from scratch any portions of their starting BSD-Lite codebase from scratch, to avoid any legal licensing problems for their kernel and OS for x86 PCs. So the the way things did turn out, is the way things would have turned out. This history is in: http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/386bsd-faq/.html http://perso.wanadoo.fr/levenez/unix/ Chris ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|