Jeff Weisberg on Fri, 28 Jun 2002 19:20:10 +0200 |
| Um... strikes me that ! really needs to be in that list too, unless | 822 also outlaws UUCP. it does not "outlaw" it. but it does not directly address the issue. the title of RFC 822 is "STANDARD FOR THE FORMAT OF ARPA INTERNET TEXT MESSAGES". (not 'standard for all text messages'). RFC 822 specifies what is or is not a valid email address only because RFC 2821 (SMTP) says that RFC 822 applies to SMTP. there is no Internet RFC for UUCP, and Internet RFCs do not (directly) apply[1] to non-Internet mail transfer. *but*, if you were to think about it, with regards to uucp, 822 "does the right thing". if ! were disallowed, there would be no legal way to gateway uucp<->smtp. gatewaying requires that an address containing a ! is "just another character" as far as smtp is concerned (so I can say "ur-valhalla!magoo!jaw@uu.net" and I'm guaranteed that this will pass correctly through intermediate systems[2]). and of course, it is 2002 now, we should not be discussing uucp. --jeff [1] of course nothing prevents authors of non-Internet protocols from adopting and applying Internet standards. [2] in theory, anyway. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|