gabriel rosenkoetter on Thu, 12 Sep 2002 20:00:11 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:54:05PM -0400, Kevin Brosius wrote: > That's an interesting question. At least for reiser, I'd expect > something like shred to be effective as long as the changes get written > to disk before the system goes down. That's because, while reiser does > journalling, it only journals metadata (directory/file system structure) > info. That's the definition of a journaling file system. One which stores all file system data (including meta-) sequentially on disk, cleaning sectors as the data in then becomes outdated, is called a log-structured file system. See: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/rosenblum90lfs.html > If you run a data overwrite tool on reiser, and leave enough time for > the changes to commit to disk, I'd expect them to be completely gone. > The same is probably not true for other styles of journalling > filesystems. I'm less familiar with them. Why wait? Heard of sync(8)? -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpgZdeeWnHCj.pgp
|
|