christophe =?unknown-8bit?q?barb=E9?= on Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:45:12 -0400 |
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:53:15PM -0700, lists wrote: > To all using KDE 3.0: Have you noticed that the speed of KDE 3.0 is > significantly slower than 2.X? Fixes? Thoughts? > > After installing SuSE Linux 8.0, which was flawless on some very new hardware, > and realizing how slow KDE 3.0 seemed to be, I went ahead and installed the > Ximian GNOME Desktop, which, in my opinion, is a very appealing and rich > desktop environment. I haven't used it long enough to run into any > difficulties or deficiencies; however, Ximian Evolution seems to be a perfect > replacement for MS Outlook. AFAIK ximian desktop is still gnome1 based. So if I am right you should try gnome2 to compare to kde3. Ximain is doing a terrific job but until they switch to gnome2 they are behind. Gnome2 rules, it's a more coherent system with accesibility features. Metacity is a window manager very light that only do it's job. ... Unfortunately, evolution is still a gnome1 app. Christophe > > Michael > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - > http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- > http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E A qui sait comprendre, peu de mots suffisent. (Intelligenti pauca.) _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|