multiple seriousity on Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:10:04 -0400 |
> > Um... could we maybe put a stop to the public AOLs? > This is not a particularly easy problem to resolve. It's a big user > education issue...mailings are set so that both "reply" and "reply > all" go to the entire list > But the end-user support side-effect remains. It is the unintended > consequence of having the "Reply-to" point only back to the list: > In order to reply to the individual sender instead of the entire list > requires additional thought and effort -- one must manually address, or > otherwise edit the outgoing message headers. I don't know, I use pine, and when I go to reply to a message it goes through the following steps of questions it asks me: first it asks me if I want to include the original message in the reply, then it asks me "Use 'Reply-to:' instead of 'From:' address?" then it asks me "Reply to all recipients?" I just want to know one thing. What is an "AOLs"? did you mean ALSO? as in ME-TOO? or is this just some term I do not know? -- msimons@slackware.com INFORMATION*MEDIA*PHOTOGRAPHY msimonsmail@yahoo.com Creative Arts Resource Project : PTMaterials Exchange : www.pleasetake.org A 501(c)3 Non-profit Organization Arts and Environmental Resource Network Shopping Online? Use http://www.igive.com/carp/ make donations at no cost! Do you like what I do? Consider donating resources to CARP; Ask me how! _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|