gabriel rosenkoetter on Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:30:05 -0500


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[PLUG] IBM xSeries experience?


I'm trying really hard to like this new x335, but it's not playing
nicely.

In shades of MCA, IBM ships the system with a non-standard single
I/O connector (so that you can stack a bunch of systems without VGA,
and two PS/2 cables dangling off each, they say)... and doesn't
include the breakout to VGA andf PS/2 by default. Then their rack
mount is physically impossible to install in an industry standard
four-post rack (and APC NetShelter).

Getting past all that, though, and finally getting the system up and
running, I find that my vendor ignored my very careful instructions
about disk partitioning, gave a ridiculous 20 GBs to /usr, and left
/home (where I actually *want* the space) starved at about 5 GBs.
So, time to blow it away and reinstall.

But booting up with RH Advanced Server 2.1's CD-ROM and loading the
block device driver disk included with it still leaves me sans hard
disk.

The disk is on the other side of an LSI Logic SCSI card that's doing
hardware RAID 1. Its BIOS screen claims it's an "LSI 1030", which
doesn't even match the format of the entries for LSI in Red Hat's
hardware compatibility list, and gets next to no hits (in English,
anyway) from Google (though maybe I didn't peruse that avenue
carefully enough just yet).

Obviously *some* kind of RH has drivers for this controller, since
there's one installed on the box when it came to me. It hadn't even
occured to me that my vendor might have *also* ignored my "install
Advanced Server 2.1, please" request and just used 7.3 or 8.gag_me.0.
I'm about to go check on that now.

So, any thoughts?

This is all a little bit disappointing after the Red Hat Road Tour
was touting their partnership with IBM, and advertising xSeries
servers on the side of the damn bus...

-- 
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

Attachment: pgp0CsYSelctk.pgp
Description: PGP signature