gabriel rosenkoetter on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:26:05 -0500 |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:52:57AM -0500, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > (btw, Sun doesn't > use OpenFirmware on Ultra 5/10's, Gabe; it's some broke-ass hacked-up > Forth interpreter that does the job on the PROM for those lowly > machines). Huh? That doesn't make sense to me. OpenFirmware is a term for an industry (and cross-vendor; at least Apple uses it too, and boy howdy do I wish I could buy an IA32 BIOS that used an OF interface) standard for addressing and presenting devices. So if it presents an OpenFirmware device tree (which it does) and accepts OpenFirmware commands (it does), then it's OpenFirmware. Now, if you mean that Sun doesn't use the same version of OpenBoot (their internally-modified OpenFirmware PROM) on the Ultra 5s and 10s that they do on the Enterprise servers, I'm totally willing to believe that (though I hadn't heard it anywhere before), especially since Apple's floated no fewer than five (and, I think, more than that) versions of their boot PROM (which they just call OpenFirmware, confusing the situation worse). -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpQGEnWxXUAV.pgp
|
|