Fred K Ollinger on Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:45:16 -0500 |
> > > Of course if we were running debian, we would have it installed all > > ready via apt. It would have taken me less than 5 minutes of work to get > > this installed on all 10 or my client boxes. :) > > How about using apt-rpm, then? That's my plan. The problem w/ rpms isn't that the packaging suck, but rather the community is not there, not as many people run apt servers. And I saw nobody running their own up2date server, please correct me if I'm wrong. I know there are two projects to reverse engineer up2date, but few people are deploying this. If the rpms for rh7.2 existed for gcc-3.2 (they do exist for rm-8.0), then I would have dropped them into my own apt-rpm repository, and I wouldn't be writing this. However, they don't and rpms don't mix n' match across distro releases as well as debs do. A few days in rpm, finally culminating in hosing glibc6 just so I could use the latest java w/ an older version of mandrake is what drove me to using debian for my personal use a few years back. Hey, I _like_ trying to roll rpms for the wrong distro, I just don't think that it's an efficient use of my time when there are better ways to do this. Also, I like to discuss compilation and as you know, I really love to complain. Fred Ollinger _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|