| gabriel rosenkoetter on Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:21:05 -0500 |
|
I'm speculating here, but: On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:06:18PM -0500, Paul wrote: > To tape More expensive over time than just going straight to disk, since you want it on disk to edit anyway and tape media degrades far faster than hard drives. > or camera memory, They don't make memory that big yet. If Chris Hedemark's 40 GB hard drive is too small for it, how could a couple gigs of memory be enough? (Unless you mean flash memory, in which case the answer is that it's too slow. EEPROM writes slower than disk writes slower than RAM.) > or to the hard drive individually. That'd be fine if you only had one running at a time, but if you're filming something live (like, say, a wedding), you probably want to cover a couple of angles at all times and splice it together later. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpdlJGbB7prI.pgp
|
|