Eugene Smiley on Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:41:04 -0500 |
Jeff wrote: > Actually, we have met, Eugene, at David's gpg talk. And I signed > your key id A7EDFD2F on 2002-12-25. You signed my key on > 2002-12-20. Apparently the real Eugene Smiley and I have met. ;-) Oops. Misunderstanding. I meant that Gabe and I haven't meet. > January or February meetings. > > Maybe this is related to why mutt (via gpg) claims the signature > on your message is not good. Or maybe it's Outlook. How odd, > anyway. I'm looking into alternative mail readers... I've given up on figuring out the issues between PGP and Outlook. >>> It'd still be nice to see some cross-signing and propogation of >>> the key, though. >> Import the key above... It's signed by PLUG members including >> Jeff if I recall. > > But isn't the same key. It is. Honest. David has stated this issue over on the PGP-Users and the GnuPG-Users mailing lists. Posted below for clarification. pgp-users@cryptorights.org <> wrote: >> Note above that according to PGP 8, key "0x49E1CBC9" was used to >> verify your message. There is no such key on my keyring!!!?? The >> only one I have is "0x99242560". > > 0x49E1CBC9 is a subkey on 0x99242560. PGP 8 is the first version > of PGP that can handle signatures made by subkeys. [...] > > David gnupg-users@gnupg.org wrote: >> This was signed with 0x49E1CBC9 (0xE2665C8749E1CBC9), but I >> _really_ can't find that key (subkey, isn't it?). Would you >> mind uploading it? > > Wow, you're fast... > > Yes, it's a subkey. I'm trying to keep it off of the pksd network > until everyone upgrades to 0.9.6 or JHPatch2, so my key won't get > mangled. In the meantime, I've put it at > http://www.jabberwocky.com/key.asc > > David _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|