Chris Hedemark on Thu, 1 May 2003 22:28:05 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Okay, fine, so it's in Microsoft's propietary format, not IBM's. So what? Point still stands; they've paid for development to present an interface through which you can retrieve this information. You're asking them to present you with a different interface to the same data. IMHO, he wasn't asking for *any* interface, but for the raw data (i.e. a one line sql statement dumping the tables onto a CD image or something) It's a bit ambiguous, but I'm not too sure you're right about this. You're requesting that they provide you with a full dump of just these several field of their table. That isn't the medium in which it exists; it exists buried in a database (which may very well have other information, including things that may NOT qualify under the Right to Know Act).
I think it is reasonable to ask for DB dumps of public data, as long as you pay a small fee for a clerk to run the query and copy it to some sort of portable media. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2rc2 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAj6x14gACgkQYPuF4Zq9lvbATwCgyB22PXMpQzMpahb1teruEZ/h w3EAoPZmoFVEw0XFpTKxGMc95WDfkn85 =08Bn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|