Chris Mann on Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:43:16 -0400 |
Good question! I just forwarded this to George since he's not on the list. >>> kaze@voicenet.com 06/09/03 11:20AM >>> Something Chris Mann's boss said during the last presentation is intriguing me. It was due to either tarpits or honeypots, tarpits I think. He said they regained 70% or their bandwidth, or their bandwidth use dropped 70% due to this. Sounds great to me, but why does this happen? The connections are mostly still there. It's not like the crackers were getting in and then moving huge files on and off the servers. Is it just the overhead of establishing and breaking down all those sessions which made such a difference? What's the downside to running these proactive-anti-cracking programs? _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|