Jeffrey J. Nonken on Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:33:15 -0400 |
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:01:47 -0400, eric@lucii.org wrote: >On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:08:15AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Nonken wrote: >>On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:42:00 -0400, kaze wrote: >>>Leaving it open might be the best option - but the screen is >>>cracked >>>and >>>it'll look ugly in the rack with the lights off. Originally I >>>tried >>>to find >>>a little plastic bit I could break or file off so the hardware >>>would >>>think >>>the lid was always up, but I don't see one. >>> >> >>It's probably part of the latch. There will be a micro-switch >>inside the case. > >That was my thought too - that or a hall effect sensor embedded in >the case? > That would be far more high-tech than needed. It's a simple mechanical limit switch. I'm not sure if it's called a micro switch because they tend to be small, or because of a company named Microswitch that originally made them, or what, but it's a common name for that kind of switch. And BTW if you wanted to use a magnetic sensor for that, a reed switch would do the job just as well. _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|