R DeWald on Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:08:04 -0400 |
Back in the day, Sunday 13 July 2003 11:58, you e-mailed this: > You forget the most important -- Non Profits must file all kinds of > City, State and Federal tax returns, and those must be signed by the > officers... It's not quite so dire, I have administered a non-profit. The problems are scalable, i.e., small ones have small problems. There are software packages that do all the tax stuff automagically. > ... translation -- PERSONAL LIABILITY for the actions of others over > whom you may or may not have control. When you ask for the right to receive and spend tax-exempt funds,then yes, you have some accountability to the government and to those who send in the funds. > Want to diffuse the liability, then incorporate... oops more paperwork > and tax returns. Not more tax returns, different ones. The incorporation paperwork can and should be handled by an attorney. There are law firms that specialize in this at a lower price point. It's not a major hassle or expense. > And more to the point -- being a non-profit does NOT mean that you > don't have expenses to stay that way. That is why "good" non-profits > are those who spend no more than 40% of their income on "overhead." That's correct, but also a bit oversimplified. Comparing NP's on the basis of % overhead is a bit like apples to oranges. Some NP's have legitimate activities/responsibilities that demand a lot of overhead, some are just poorly administered, some are outright dishonest. You can't tell the difference by just looking at the %overhead. Some NP's have 100% overhead because they are providing a service rather than redistributing contributions. Having said all that, I think the issues here revolve more around what you want to do and how you want to fund it. If it's a bunch of hobbyists getting together to make some discarded PC's useful to some kids that can use them, then why put anything (other than where to meet for beer afterward) on paper? If you plan to put a full support community in place then you are going to need money, even if your workforce is volunteer. There's lots of money looking for tax relief, I don't think you'd have much trouble getting it, but being set up to get it does require that you have your ducks in a row and someone will have to be paid to line them up and keep them that way. I don't think one option excludes the other. Why not do a pilot project with whatever hardware you have now and see what happens? Solving problems you actually have is going to accomplish more for the kids than speculating about solutions to problems you imagine you might have. The discussion is interesting and useful, but's let's face it, it's just making all of us feel smart. Until some rubber hits the road, it's still just good intentions, and we all know where that road goes. My suspicion is that if you do the pilot project then the rest of the problems and the work required to address them will become known, if there are any. I think everyone should expect (and be emotionally prepared to accept ) that a certain number of these PC's will be sold by the parents almost immediately upon receipt. That's just reality. Another portion of them will become paperweights and dust pedestals. It takes a really special combination of resourcefulness and self-respect to take advantage of an opportunity like this and there are a fair number of families in your target demographic that are going to lack said resourcefulness and self-respect. Unfortunately, you can't give them that. We all know the value of our OSS expertise and we'd like to make good use of it. I think that is fantastic. This is a great idea, but before too much energy goes into deciding what flavor of 501(C) is best, I think it might be really instructive to just do something. _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|