Kam Salisbury on Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:37:17 -0400 |
Many thanks for your suggestions Chris. My goal is to just share what I am doing (have learned?) without relinquishing the rights to my ideas. From what I have seen thus far, it is very difficult to create something open source in nature and actually get paid for it unless the completed work is a black box and the source is closed (ala' MS). Therefore, I am less realistic about getting compensated for the code then I am others actually finding the code useful. I think I will take a closer look at the BSD license before making up my mind... Thanks again. -- Kam Salisbury http://kamsalisbury.com > > On Friday, July 18, 2003, at 06:12 AM, Kam Salisbury wrote: > >> So, my question is, which license is more appropriate for something >> that is >> just open source? > > I would suggest limiting your choices to two or three selections. > -snip _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|