Tobias DiPasquale on Mon, 21 Jul 2003 07:05:23 -0400

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Which license?

On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 21:41, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> This seems incorrect as and recent
> linux kernel discussions about wireless routers will attest
> ( 
> Distributing products containing GPL software seems to require the
> release of that software, or the return of the code changes to specific
> project.

Excellent finds. I wasn't aware that they had released their code. I
know they were being pressured to release awhile back but I never
followed it. I stand corrected. Thanks :)

> However, if such code was used internally to a company, and not released
> as a product, I don't believe there is any requirement to release
> changes to that code.

This is absolutely true. Many newer IT companies would have severe
strategy changes in order were this not the case.

Tobias DiPasquale
88FA 30C9 1E63 CFE2 CBD8  37C4 DA1C E2BF 1D26 F036

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part