kmhryhpdblyx on Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:17:06 -0400 |
At 09:10 PM 9/12/2003, Paul wrote: William H. Magill wrote: I've had the same idea myself. There seems to be a lot of under-utilized creation of open-source software. But the problem as I see it is that most of the money is in boring, vertical-market software. It's not the kind of code that programmers like to write for fun. Lots of people want to work on a compiler, but very few care to do a billing application. As an example, I work in the non-profit sector. It's not unusual for agencies to spend tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars on software that isn't always very good. I bet mine isn't the only field where that's the case. There might be a good opportunity for an open-source application to enter the market and take away share from the established vendors. Where's the money? Installation, customization, support, training etc....everything that the commercial boys provide minus the license fees. -- Jim Foster - jif "at" computer .org http://www.voicenet.com/~jfoster "Being on a Beemer and not having a wave returned by a ICQ 679709 Sportster is like having a clipper ship's hailing not RAM 2500 Cummins returned by an orphaned New Jersey solid waste barge." -OTL '03 GL1800A _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|