John Fiore on Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:45:14 -0400 |
It's funny that you should mention it. I just read part of a paper about it last week. It sounds like interesting stuff, but I'm not sure how mature their reference implementation is yet. Have you thought about just running NFS over IPSec? If you're just interested in getting files for yourself from home, it sounds like there's a lot in SFS that you don't really need. If you do end up using it, I'd be very curious to hear what your experiences are. Good luck with it. John --- Jeff Abrahamson <jeff@purple.com> wrote: > Anyone used SFS? > > http://www.fs.net/sfswww/ > http://www.fs.net/sfswww/sfsfaq.html > > From the FAQ, > > What is SFS? > > SFS is a network file system that provides > strong security over > untrusted networks. At the same time, SFS goes > to great lengths to > prevent security from hurting performance or > becoming an > administrative burden. > > I'm thinking of setting it up as a nice way to > access my data at > school from home. I currently use ssh, but it would > be even faster to > run emacs at home against a remote file than to > display back an emacs > session. > > -- > Jeff > > Jeff Abrahamson <http://www.purple.com/jeff/> > GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276 63C6 > 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|