|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
gabriel rosenkoetter said:
>
>> the true test would be if you recieved that email. did you? :)
>
> He's not quincy, so he doesn't really know. But he should have
> received the postmaster email, for sure.
I am quincy. I am sure I received it and since it was spam my filter
kicked in and I subsequently deleted it. I saw the log entries after the
fact and can't go back and make sure.
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:07:09AM -0400, Jon Nelson wrote:
>> Since it was a bounce message I wouldn't have gotten anything, and
>> didn't.
>
> Did I just hear you say "I don't read any of the mail addressed to
> postmaster@my.domain?"
Negative Batman. I do have postmaster aliased to root and root to quincy.
What I was saying was that the message generated and sent by my server
was a bounce message being sent to the forged address. Then the forged
address replied to the bounce message with another bounce message. If
this is something I should see, I didn't.
>
> Bad, bad, bad decision, Jon. Please, be a good Internet neighbor and
> pay attention to your mail system's primary reporting channel.
I am, I am! And I don't make noise after 10 PM either. ;)
>
> --
> gabriel rosenkoetter
> gr@eclipsed.net
>
--
Trooper Jon S. Nelson, Linux Certified Admin., CCNA
Pa. State Police, Bureau of Criminal Investigation
Computer Crimes Unit
Work: 610.344.4471 Cell/Page: 866.284.1603
jonelson@state.pa.us
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|