Adam Turoff on 2 Jan 2004 15:26:03 -0000 |
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 03:00:40AM -0500, Paul wrote: > One thought that comes to mind is another contrast between your forum > concept and PLUG. PLUG is cooperative and not profit oriented. > Businesses are usually the exact opposite. Why would successful > companies or consultants want to reveal secrets to competitors? I don't see how your comparision is particularly relevant. Yes, businesses compete with each other. But apparel retailers, coffee shops, convenience stores and restaurants do not compete directly with each other. Furthermore, businesses in the same sector tend to compete on their own products and services, not in IT. Further still, companies that compete on IT are competing on the value IT adds to the organization, not on the value something as basic as, say Linux, brings to the table. For example, Linux adoption is big on Wall Street, and all of the big banks have a good idea what their peers are doing with Linux. They are all happy to share success stories on how Linux works great with clusters and mainframes, but zealously guard precisely how Linux helped to make their foreign exchange desk the most profitable one on the street. Gathering together to share information about basic technology does not impede the ability of a business to compete against its competitors. And there's good precedent here: in the 1950s, SHARE started as a group of corporate users of early IBM machines. IIRC, they went so far as to write a time sharing operating system for these machines because (a) IBM didn't see the value there, and (b) because time sharing made these machines much more valuable to the SHARE member organizations. Z. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|