Mark M. Hoffman on 29 Jan 2004 17:18:02 -0000 |
* Walt Mankowski <waltman@pobox.com> [2004-01-29 10:54:29 -0500]: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:37:41AM -0500, Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > > The man page says: > > > > "Not all resources are measured by all versions of Unix, > > so some of the values might be reported as zero. > > The present selection was mostly inspired by the data > > provided by 4.2 or 4.3BSD." > > > > > better utility I could be using to get this information? > > > > Is it a C program? Try valgrind (if it's not too slow)... > > > > http://valgrind.kde.org/ > > > > Or, you could also try to read it out of /proc/<pid>/status. > > Yes, I read that in the man page as well. But it seems to me that > Linux *is* reporting memory usage. The fields are set in > /proc/<pid>/status, and they show up when I run top(1). So why can't > time(1) see them? Sorry, I don't know. Read the source? ;) > > The present selection was mostly inspired by the data > > provided by 4.2 or 4.3BSD." Maybe they're just not there. A couple bog-standard Linux boxes give the same results here, so I don't think you've misconfigured anything (if that's what you're after). Regards, -- Mark M. Hoffman mhoffman@lightlink.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|