Walt Mankowski on 29 Jan 2004 19:01:02 -0000 |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:17:29PM -0500, Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > Sorry, I don't know. Read the source? ;) If I wasn't too lazy to read the source, would I have emailed PLUG? :) I'm guessing maybe wait3(2) isn't returning the memory usage information. I'll report back if I find anything out. > Maybe they're just not there. Sounds like it, but it's hard to understand why not. Linux is clearly keeping track of the information internally, since it shows up under /proc. > A couple bog-standard Linux boxes give the same results here, > so I don't think you've misconfigured anything (if that's what > you're after). bog-standard? Walt Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|