Gregson Helledy on 10 Mar 2004 15:32:03 -0000 |
>Uh...well, when I installed RH something told me that the box was an >i686. Is that a P4? Or is there no relationship? Also, why are Celerons >the poor relations of the Intel family? Is it the cache, or lack thereof? An i686 is apparently anything Pentium II or faster. I compiled a custom kernel for my Athlon but uname -a still describes it as i686. This Slashdot article: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/05/0554230&mode=thread covers an Anandtech article on Celeron performance. It compares the new 2+ GHz Celerons to Duron, AthlonXP and Pentium 4 chips, and offers explanations as to the differences. Let's just say that the Celeron didn't do that well. Greg -- Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify GRA, Inc. (postmaster@gra-inc.com) immediately. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by GRA, Inc. unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative independent of this message. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|