Michael Leone on 12 Mar 2004 01:46:02 -0000 |
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 10:43, Gregson Helledy wrote: > >Uh...well, when I installed RH something told me that the box was an > >i686. Is that a P4? Or is there no relationship? Also, why are Celerons > >the poor relations of the Intel family? Is it the cache, or lack thereof? > > An i686 is apparently anything Pentium II or faster. I compiled > a custom kernel for my Athlon but uname -a still describes it as i686. > > This Slashdot article: > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/05/0554230&mode=thread > covers an Anandtech article on Celeron performance. It compares > the new 2+ GHz Celerons to Duron, AthlonXP and Pentium 4 chips, and > offers explanations as to the differences. Let's just say that the > Celeron didn't do that well. I ended up ordering the Walmart PC for $228 or so, with shipping. AMD Duron 1.4GHz, 128M RAM. I'll need to pick up some more, since all I have is PC2100 DDR RAM, which I don't think is compatible. But 133MHz SDRAM shouldn't be too much more. Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|