Matthew Ozor on 11 Jun 2004 17:19:02 -0000 |
Your ansewer was fine but my question was how to enter an extended ascii symbol in VIM. The character set is unimportant to the question. I realize that there are different symbols for different standards. Entering them in VIM is the same no matter what term you are using or . Someone did post CTRL-V and I must have overlooked it with the 8 paragpraph on ISO and ANSI theory that surrounded it. My question should have sounded like this. What is the correct key combination for entering extended ascii characters in VIM. System: Mandrake 9.1 Linux kernel 2.4.21 TERM=xterm SHELL=/bin/bash VIM 6.1 keyboard = 107 key Dell monitor = Viewsonic P95f+ 19" I thought using the old ms-dos way of entering them as an example would shine light on the question and result in a ansewer. Man now im "grumpy" ... who talks like that... --- Jeff Weisberg <jaw+plug@tcp4me.com> wrote: > > > > mtozor@yahoo.com wrote: > [...] > | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > | > | Your going to tell me that %G�%@ is not an > extended ascii > ^^ > | symbol - it was the symbol I orginal asked about > in my > | first post on this topic. > > > I don't think you'll care to hear my answer, so you > should hit > delete now, but for the other people on the list > that do care, > and would like to learn: > > Your email headers indicate "US-ASCII". The > indicated character > has a value of 0xEC (239). Being outside the range > of 0-127 > it is not a valid ASCII character. > > What is it? How do we display it? What does it look > like? > > There are a *large* number of character sets which > extend > ASCII, and have characters in the range 128-255. But > they > are all different. If we don't know which of the > many > "extended ascii" character sets you mean, we have no > way > to know how to interpret the above character. > > perhaps an example: > > the above character (0xEC) has the following > interpretation in each of these "extended ascii" > character sets: > > iso-8859-1 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > iso-8859-2 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CARON > iso-8859-3 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > iso-8859-4 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT > ABOVE > iso-8859-5 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SOFT SIGN > iso-8859-6 ARABIC DAMMATAN > iso-8859-7 GREEK SMALL LETTER MU > iso-8859-8 HEBREW LETTER LAMED > iso-8859-9 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > iso-8859-10 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT > ABOVE > iso-8859-11 THAI CHARACTER THANTHAKHAT > iso-8859-13 LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA > iso-8859-14 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > iso-8859-15 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > iso-8859-16 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > KOI8-R CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER EL > CP437 INFINITY > CP850 LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE > CP855 CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER VE > CP866 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SOFT SIGN > [...] > > these are all equally valid interpretations of your > ambiguous "extended ascii" above. > > different people on the PLUG list will see your > "extended ascii" character in different of the above > ways. > and none are wrong. > > (actually, your message should be rejected as > corrupt, but > that's a different thread altogether) > > > --jeff > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- > http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|