Matthew Ozor on 15 Jun 2004 14:22:02 -0000 |
Since were back on the topic. Is there a character set for linux that matches the IBM/OEM character set that has the extendend ascii block and line symbols? I notice that after I run BitchX it changes some setting in my term that allows me to use these symbols. For instance if I use decimal 219 I get a U with two dots over it but after I run BitchX I get a filled block. Any idea on what setting is changed? Any help or useful information will be most grateful. Matt OzOr --- LeRoy Cressy <ldc@lrcressy.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matthew Ozor wrote: > | Your ansewer was fine but my question was how to > enter > | an extended ascii symbol in VIM. The character set > is > | unimportant to the question. > > The character set is very important because > depending on what character > set that your system is running determines the > character. Like Jeff > Weisberg pointed out the resulting character depends > on what character > set you are using. The DOS system usually defaulted > to CP437 which was > an 8 bit character set. The various DOS systems > called CP437 ASCII > which was really not true, since the original ASCII > is a 7 bit > character set. > > What I think you are asking for is how to get > terminal support for CP437 > so that you can display 8bit CP437 characters. In > your efforts to > create ASCII art you might end up with something > totally different than > what you envision. For example let's say that your > recipient is using a > different character set than what you created your > art in, then they > will not see the same thing that you originally > envisioned. The thing > about DOS was that it was set up to be country > specific where it was > sold. The DOS sold in Germany had a German > character set whereas the US > version had a CP437 Character set. With Linux where > it is downloaded > from the Internet, each user sets up their console > for themselves. The > default for US users is en_US using the 7 bit > character set. > > > > I realize that there are > | different symbols for different standards. > Entering > | them in VIM is the same no matter what term you > are > | using. > > Are you sure? > > ~ Someone did post CTRL-V and I must have > | overlooked it with the 8 paragpraph on ISO and > ANSI > | theory that surrounded it. > | > | My question should have sounded like this. > | > | What is the correct key combination for entering > | extended ascii characters in VIM. > > | I thought using the old ms-dos way of entering > them as > | an example would shine light on the question and > | result in a ansewer. > > If you changed the codepage in the old msdos the > results would reflect > the codepage character set. > > Man now im "grumpy" ... who talks > | like that... > | > | > | --- Jeff Weisberg <jaw+plug@tcp4me.com> wrote: > | > |> > |> > |>mtozor@yahoo.com wrote: > |>[...] > |>| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > |>| > |>| Your going to tell me that %G�%@ is not an > |>extended ascii > |> ^^ > |>| symbol - it was the symbol I orginal asked about > |>in my > |>| first post on this topic. > |> > |> > |>I don't think you'll care to hear my answer, so > you > |>should hit > |>delete now, but for the other people on the list > |>that do care, > |>and would like to learn: > |> > |>Your email headers indicate "US-ASCII". The > |>indicated character > |>has a value of 0xEC (239). Being outside the range > |>of 0-127 > |>it is not a valid ASCII character. > |> > |>What is it? How do we display it? What does it > look > |>like? > |> > |>There are a *large* number of character sets which > |>extend > |>ASCII, and have characters in the range 128-255. > But > |>they > |>are all different. If we don't know which of the > |>many > |>"extended ascii" character sets you mean, we have > no > |>way > |>to know how to interpret the above character. > |> > |>perhaps an example: > |> > |>the above character (0xEC) has the following > |>interpretation in each of these "extended ascii" > |>character sets: > |> > |> iso-8859-1 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > |> iso-8859-2 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CARON > |> iso-8859-3 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > |> iso-8859-4 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT > |>ABOVE > |> iso-8859-5 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SOFT SIGN > |> iso-8859-6 ARABIC DAMMATAN > |> iso-8859-7 GREEK SMALL LETTER MU > |> iso-8859-8 HEBREW LETTER LAMED > |> iso-8859-9 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > |> iso-8859-10 LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT > |>ABOVE > |> iso-8859-11 THAI CHARACTER THANTHAKHAT > |> iso-8859-13 LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH > CEDILLA > |> iso-8859-14 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > |> iso-8859-15 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > |> iso-8859-16 LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE > |> KOI8-R CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER EL > |> CP437 INFINITY > |> CP850 LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE > |> CP855 CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER VE > |> CP866 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SOFT SIGN > |> [...] > |> > |>these are all equally valid interpretations of > your > |>ambiguous "extended ascii" above. > |> > |>different people on the PLUG list will see your > |>"extended ascii" character in different of the > above > |>ways. > |>and none are wrong. > |> > |>(actually, your message should be rejected as > |>corrupt, but > |>that's a different thread altogether) > |> > |> > |> --jeff > |> > |> > | > | > ___________________________________________________________________________ > | > |>Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- > |>http://www.phillylinux.org > |>Announcements - > |> > | > | > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > | > |>General Discussion -- > | > | http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > | > | > | > | > | > | __________________________________ > | Do you Yahoo!? > | Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. > | http://messenger.yahoo.com/ > | > ___________________________________________________________________________ > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|